Ebpay生命医药出版社

Ebpay生命

100763

论文已发表

提 交 论 文


注册即可获取Ebpay生命的最新动态

注 册



IF 收录期刊



  • 3.3 Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)
  • 3.4 Clin Epidemiol
  • 2.5 Cancer Manag Res
  • 2.9 Infect Drug Resist
  • 3.5 Clin Interv Aging
  • 4.7 Drug Des Dev Ther
  • 2.7 Int J Chronic Obstr
  • 6.6 Int J Nanomed
  • 2.5 Int J Women's Health
  • 2.5 Neuropsych Dis Treat
  • 2.7 OncoTargets Ther
  • 2.0 Patient Prefer Adher
  • 2.3 Ther Clin Risk Manag
  • 2.5 J Pain Res
  • 2.8 Diabet Metab Synd Ob
  • 2.8 Psychol Res Behav Ma
  • 3.0 Nat Sci Sleep
  • 1.8 Pharmgenomics Pers Med
  • 2.7 Risk Manag Healthc Policy
  • 4.2 J Inflamm Res
  • 2.1 Int J Gen Med
  • 4.2 J Hepatocell Carcinoma
  • 3.7 J Asthma Allergy
  • 1.9 Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
  • 2.7 J Multidiscip Healthc



更多详情 >>





视频

Ethical decision making in pain management: a conceptual framework

 

Authors Carvalho AS, Martins Pereira S, Jácomo A, Magalhães S, Araújo J, Hernández-Marrero P, Costa Gomes C, Schatman ME

Received 18 January 2018

Accepted for publication 18 March 2018

Published 15 May 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 967—976

DOI http://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S162926

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Andrew Yee

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Erica Wegrzyn

Introduction: The practice and study of pain management pose myriad ethical challenges. There is a consensual opinion that adequate management of pain is a medical obligation rooted in classical Greek practice. However, there is evidence that patients often suffer from uncontrolled and unnecessary pain. This is inconsistent with the leges artis, and its practical implications merit a bioethical analysis. Several factors have been identified as causes of uncontrolled and unnecessary pain, which deprive patients from receiving appropriate treatments that theoretically they have the right to access. Important factors include (with considerable regional, financial, and cultural differences) the following: 1) failure to identify pain as a priority in patient care; 2) failure to establish an adequate physician–patient relationship; 3) insufficient knowledge regarding adequate prescription of analgesics; 4) conflicting notions associated with drug-induced risk of tolerance and fear of addiction; 5) concerns regarding “last-ditch” treatments of severe pain; and 6) failure to be accountable and equitable.
Objective: The aim of this article was to establish that bioethics can serve as a framework for addressing these challenging issues and, from theoretical to practical approaches, bioethical reflection can contextualize the problem of unrelieved pain.
Methods: This article is organized into three parts. First, we illustrate that pain management and its undertreatment are indeed ethical issues. The second part describes possible ethical frameworks that can be combined and integrated to better define the ethical issues in pain management. Finally, we discuss possible directions forward to improve ethical decision making in pain management.
Discussion: We argue that 1) the treatment of pain is an ethical obligation, 2) health science schools, especially medical training institutions, have the duty to teach pain management in a comprehensive fashion, and 3) regulatory measures, which prevent patients from access to opioid treatment as indicated in their cases, are unethical and should be reconsidered.
Conclusion: Developing an ethical framework for pain management will result in enhanced quality of care, linking the epistemic domains of pain management to their anthropological foundations, thereby making them ethically sound.
Keywords: bioethics, pain management, ethical decision making, ethics of care, narrative medicine, patient-centered care

 


摘要视频链接:Ethical decision making in pain management






Download Article[PDF]