论文已发表
提 交 论 文
注册即可获取Ebpay生命的最新动态
注 册
IF 收录期刊
超声引导下腓肠神经和胫神经阻滞与腘窝坐骨神经阻滞在跟骨手术后镇痛效果相当:一项单中心随机对照双盲研究
Authors Yao J, Cai J, Lu Q, Huang X
Received 12 November 2024
Accepted for publication 21 March 2025
Published 1 April 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 1765—1773
DOI http://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S506049
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Jinlei Li
Jun Yao,1,2,* Jialin Cai,2,* Qingwang Lu,2 Xiaojing Huang3
1Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Jinjiang Municipal Hospital (Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital Fujian Campus), Shanghai, Fujian, 362200, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Pain Medicine, Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Xiaojing Huang, Department of Pain Medicine, Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center, No. 2560 Chunshen Road, Minhang District, Shanghai, 201104, People’s Republic of China, Email anesthesiahuang@163.com
Background: Popliteal sciatic nerve blocks have gained popularity as an anesthesia choice for calcaneal surgery. While the simpler technique of sural and tibial nerve blocks offers potential, its safety and efficacy require validation through a head-to-head clinical study. This study compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided sural and tibial nerve blocks (ST) with popliteal sciatic nerve block (PS) for operative and postoperative analgesia.
Methods: A total of 80 patients (40 per group) undergoing calcaneal surgery were randomized to receive either ST or PS nerve blocks. Patients in both groups were provided with an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device containing flurbiprofen. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded at awakening, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. In addition, block onset time, procedure duration, patient satisfaction, and application of postoperative analgesics were also recorded.
Results: VAS scores were comparable between groups throughout the 24-hour observation period (VAS range 0– 3, p > 0.05). ST blocks demonstrated faster onset (8.2 ± 1.5 vs 12.4 ± 2.1 minutes, p< 0.001) and shorter procedure time (11.5 ± 2.1 vs 16.8 ± 2.4 minutes, p< 0.001). Patient satisfaction scores were similar between groups (8.5 ± 0.8 vs 8.3 ± 0.9, p=0.31).
Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided sural and tibial nerve blocks provide effective operative and postoperative analgesia comparable to popliteal sciatic nerve block. The blocks are easy to perform, have a faster onset, and achieve high patient satisfaction, making them a valuable alternative for calcaneal surgery.
Keywords: calcaneal surgery, ultrasound-guided, popliteal sciatic nerve block, tibial nerve block, sural nerve block