100763
论文已发表
提 交 论 文
注册即可获取Ebpay生命的最新动态
注 册
IF 收录期刊
- 3.3 Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)
- 3.4 Clin Epidemiol
- 2.5 Cancer Manag Res
- 2.9 Infect Drug Resist
- 3.5 Clin Interv Aging
- 4.7 Drug Des Dev Ther
- 2.7 Int J Chronic Obstr
- 6.6 Int J Nanomed
- 2.5 Int J Women's Health
- 2.5 Neuropsych Dis Treat
- 2.7 OncoTargets Ther
- 2.0 Patient Prefer Adher
- 2.3 Ther Clin Risk Manag
- 2.5 J Pain Res
- 2.8 Diabet Metab Synd Ob
- 2.8 Psychol Res Behav Ma
- 3.0 Nat Sci Sleep
- 1.8 Pharmgenomics Pers Med
- 2.7 Risk Manag Healthc Policy
- 4.2 J Inflamm Res
- 2.1 Int J Gen Med
- 4.2 J Hepatocell Carcinoma
- 3.7 J Asthma Allergy
- 1.9 Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
- 2.7 J Multidiscip Healthc
已发表论文
晚期和转移性肾细胞癌的靶向治疗的临床结果：在老幼患者之间的是否存在差异？
Authors Zhang G, Zhu Y, Dong D, Gu W, Zhang H, Sun L, Ye D
Published Date November 2014 Volume 2014:7 Pages 2043—2052
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S70012
Received 25 June 2014, Accepted 18 September 2014, Published 3 November 2014
Approved for publication by Dr Faris Farassati
Background: To assess whether the clinical outcome of advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with targeted therapy differs between young and old patients.
Patients and methods: A total of 327 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and mRCC who received targeted therapy in two Chinese clinical centers were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were stratified into three groups: young (aged <45 years), middle-aged (aged 45–64 years), and old (aged ≥65 years). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were drawn using the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox's proportional hazard regression model was used to compare OS and PFS within age groups.
Results: There were no significant differences among young, middle-aged, and old groups in terms of OS (P =0.087), whereas PFS in the old group was significantly better than in the young and middle-aged groups (P =0.043). Both OS and PFS in the younger groups (aged <65 years) were significantly worse than in the old group (age ≥65 years; median OS, 28.1 vs 28.7 months [P =0.029]; median PFS, 11.4 vs 14 months [P =0.015]). No difference in OS or PFS was found between the young and middle-aged groups. After adjusting for sex, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, history of cytokines, and Fuhrman grade, old age was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS and PFS compared with younger age (<65 years) (OS, hazard ratio, 0.552 [95% confidence interval, 0.329–0.828; P =0.006]; PFS, hazard ratio, 0.584 [95% confidence interval, 0.401–0.850; P =0.005]).
Conclusion: Younger patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and mRCC receiving targeted therapy have a poorer prognosis compared with old patients. These results remain to be examined in prospective cohorts.
Patients and methods: A total of 327 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and mRCC who received targeted therapy in two Chinese clinical centers were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were stratified into three groups: young (aged <45 years), middle-aged (aged 45–64 years), and old (aged ≥65 years). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were drawn using the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox's proportional hazard regression model was used to compare OS and PFS within age groups.
Results: There were no significant differences among young, middle-aged, and old groups in terms of OS (P =0.087), whereas PFS in the old group was significantly better than in the young and middle-aged groups (P =0.043). Both OS and PFS in the younger groups (aged <65 years) were significantly worse than in the old group (age ≥65 years; median OS, 28.1 vs 28.7 months [P =0.029]; median PFS, 11.4 vs 14 months [P =0.015]). No difference in OS or PFS was found between the young and middle-aged groups. After adjusting for sex, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, history of cytokines, and Fuhrman grade, old age was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS and PFS compared with younger age (<65 years) (OS, hazard ratio, 0.552 [95% confidence interval, 0.329–0.828; P =0.006]; PFS, hazard ratio, 0.584 [95% confidence interval, 0.401–0.850; P =0.005]).
Conclusion: Younger patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and mRCC receiving targeted therapy have a poorer prognosis compared with old patients. These results remain to be examined in prospective cohorts.
Keywords: kidney cancer, metastasis, targeted therapy, prognosis, age
Download Article[PDF]
